top of page
364A8136.jpg

Autumn 2022

Learning Research from Multiple Angles

Classes:

PHYS 114/117: Algebra-Based Physics I

SPH 480: Research Methods in Public Health

HONORS 210A: New Literacy Studies - The Politics of Translation

MUSEN 303: Marching Band

HONORS 397: Peer Educator Seminar

Leading Global Challenges Discussion

Honors Program

IMG_3817.jpeg

Perhaps one of the most stressful yet incredibly rewarding activities I have done in college has been the opportunity to moderate this year’s Global Challenges event. I can still remember vividly the excitement (and therefore, also stress) I felt throughout this entire process, imagining conversing with highly respected leaders among an audience of hundreds of my fellow students at UW. Even more so, I am grateful for the exposure I had into planning what seems like a relatively straightforward event. While this event boils down to a faculty discussion, I had some very insightful conversations with many honors faculty members about how to set the proper tone throughout the evening, what my role as a student representative would be, and even more simply how I could steel myself as a confident public speaker. Overall I felt that this event went very well, and although there were a few hiccups, I am extremely grateful to have had such a unique experience in learning more about some incredible speakers.

Research has played a significant role in my college experience, from writing literature reviews to working in a lab. However, these two courses in particular between my public health sequence and my honors courses has revealed a particularly interesting illustration to me of the breadth of what research can look like. In SPH 480, I worked with a team of students to create a cross sectional study with real college student responses to determine the relationship between sleep quality and anxiety. In H210, I did a rather unique qualitative study on defining marching band as a discourse community by interviewing a few of my fellow members in the marching band and having them have a real time discussion putting together a halftime show while I analyzed their interactions with one another. I think this unique exposure to research styles has not only influenced what I consider to be research, but also the unique strengths and weaknesses of each type. For example, in SPH 480 I had significant difficulties in finding enough people to respond to our survey to get statistically significant results. However, in H210, I had much more trouble trying to figure out how I could tangibly interpret solely qualitative data. I hope to use these unique interactions in my future research efforts!

Learning Two Kinds of Research Methods

SPH 480 + HONORS 210A

            With this being my second year as an honors peer educator, my views on what leadership is and what it means for me in the context of being not just an instructor, but also a peer have been vastly changed. The main new aspect of leadership that I grappled with this quarter was adaptability, but in a different way from last year. Last year, I also said adaptability in the moment because plans tend to change, schedules get altered, and students need different kinds of support from what I might have previously expected. However, this year I mean adaptability in the sense of overcoming those expectations from a past year since my class was significantly different this year. Since I thought my class’s engagement was stellar last year, I decided to keep most of my lesson plans the same under the assumption that it would have the same outcome. However, I was wrong in making that assumption as this year’s class seemed to be much quieter than I had anticipated. Thus, I had to adapt not only mentally, but also physically by altering around my lesson plans (particularly icebreakers) to find new ways that would be more engaging to this specific set of students. Essentially, this quarter has taught me that while experience is useful, it is never complete until you are in the moment adjusting to the unique personalities of each person in a class, and that is what true leadership is.

            In future leadership roles, I want to be seen as someone who people can go to as an equal. Of course respectful acknowledgement of someone’s particular knowledge or skillset is important, although I think some interactions between students and instructors (myself included) are more beneficial when the student is free to talk to the instructor as a friend. It encourages open honesty for more accurate and applicable advice as well as fostering a more useful connection that promotes discussion over lecturing. This openness in thinking is what drives many of the conversations within the honors program, and it is why I think that a leader that focuses on being a listener is one that I strive to be in my future endeavors.

            Throughout the H397 seminar, I’ve learned a lot about fostering student engagement, the intricacies of running a class through lesson plan revision, and effective communication skills both inside and outside the classroom. While these are all invaluable skills, I think that the most impactful aspect was the community among other peer educators that I made while in this class. I had the chance to hear other students doing crazy icebreakers that inspired me for ideas next year, voice my joyful moments and complaints, and bounce ideas between other peer educators. This low stress community of people growing with each other was immensely useful to me both in developing my lesson plans and just simply through encouragement from one another. Many of my self-reflections through this class were actually what I had expected and were similar to many of the thoughts I had last year in terms of self-care and brainstorming/reflecting on activities within my classes. Regardless, I still think sharing it with other peer educators and hearing their reflections were very useful in helping me develop my own mindset as a leader.

            In other future student leadership positions, I hope to apply my experience in adapting my communication and teaching based on the people I am leading to make them feel the most comfortable around me as an equal. I firmly believe that students work better academically when they feel as though they are rooted in a community, whether it be struggling through ochem or knowing that they will have the chance to go out for lunch with their friends after an academic event. This is why I try to apply this philosophy of teaching in my other leadership positions as outreach director in Grey Matters and co-president in GlobeMed. I would argue that what I’ve learned in teaching in H100 is even more crucial in the context of a club because there is one additional hurdle of even getting people to voluntarily stay in the club, and I’ve observed that establishing a community is the best way to do this. In other words, honors students are required to take H100 so most student will show up regardless, but that is not true for my clubs where people can simply leave. In short, my main takeaway from this quarter is the importance of making community and tailoring it to the specific needs of the people in the group, which is my goal to focus on for the rest of my college career and beyond.

Refining adaptability in the context of community

HONORS 397

bottom of page